#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK FULL#
#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK WINDOWS 10#
#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK DOWNLOAD#

It takes quite the effort to consistently worsen user experience ignoring any user feedback and defending dubious telemetry as if it were a godsend. With the scary parenthetical warning 'not supported.' Designers have decided that their user interface is more important than the content it enables, and therefore we all must have more useless UI margin space.Д®dit: Upon further investigation, can be set to true and restore the feature on the customize toolbar page. What? I guess incremental values were always supposed to go middle, low, high and I am just a crank.ДЄll three options waste more vertical space with useless UI margins than the current version of Firefox. Nonsensically, the browser.uidensity field allows values 0, 1, and 2, but: Almost.Дownloading the nightly build, some investigation reveals the ability to reduce the space stolen by the user interface for pointless margins is hidden in about:config and can be found by searching there for 'density.' With this update, it seems that change is finally here. I remember reading about the end of 'compact' mode some weeks/months ago. I guess everything has to be mobile-first now, but it's increasingly close to 'desktop-barely.' WM_POINTER is also buggy with split panes, so I hope you didn't want to draw while doing something else.) I go back to the photo and try to close it, and now I am all the way back to the start menu. I hit back, it goes back, but the picture remains open.

#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK WINDOWS 10#

Windows 10 honestly comes closer than expected, but then misses in such a way that it can feel both awkward to use on a desktop (the settings app is pretty uncomfortable, along with photos and to some extent even calculator) and on a tablet (tablet mode is hard to navigate I double click an image in File Explorer, it launches Photos. If it's possible, the 'state of the art' isn't really selling it. It really should be an indictment of the insistence that it's possible to make one single design that works well on all form factors, or even just two form factors as disparate as a tablet and a desktop PC. Similarly, IMO, using GNOME 3 adapted for phones via Phosh feels far more natural than using GNOME 3 on desktop. Oh, and which is fundamentally about this very notification issue, completely unacknowledged after two years. There is an unacknowledged report about the About Firefox window not floating ( ), which I expect is connected. But now I look, I actually canвЂ™t find anything about it on Bugzilla (though I can find a complaint about it on Reddit two years ago). IвЂ™ve been thinking I should confirm that thereвЂ™s a bug report for this at some point, though I canвЂ™t imagine itвЂ™s unknown.

#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK DOWNLOAD#

Still, I decided to favour the notifications (at the cost of download windows and the likes) in my current compromise:ДЇor_window border none, floating enable, move position 79 ppt 88 ppt And thereвЂ™s no good way of targeting them properly to work around this: theyвЂ™re just Firefox windows with an empty title but so are download prompts and one or two other things.

#FIREFOX ADDONS ALL BLANK FULL#

The most significant place where this goes horribly wrong is notifications: whenever a notification arrives, bam! itвЂ™s a full tiling window that steals focus and probably takes half the screen, shuffling everything else around, rather than being marked as a notification window, which would make it float in the requested position, get no decorations, and not get focused.

The biggest problem I find with Firefox under Sway is that its child windows donвЂ™t get sane window types. So multiple lies surrounding this product, along with it being continuously pushed on users (I've had it disabled via pref since day 1, and then it started showing up on the new tab page regardless).ДЄnd people are surprised when it gets hate. :rolling eyes:'ДЄlso, I can't find the reference anymore, but I definitely remember promises of getting a pref to use a different backend. Apparently, _someone_ in bizdev thought that 'revenue sharing' doesn't involve money, and spread information inside Mozilla accordingly. This way key to the discussion about why they chose Pocket over any other reading list plugins - but this turned out to be a lie: 'Hum. During launch, it was specifically described as not being a paid placement: 'There's no monetary benefit to Mozilla from the integration: Pocket didn't pay for placement in the browser'. Aside from being unwanted, it also is symbolic of much of Mozilla's worst behavior.

Firefox addons all blank